View All Blogs

Is Your Job Description Scaring Away the Right Candidates?

Finding the right person for a role isn’t always easy. And sometimes, the challenge starts before a candidate even applies…

A job description is one of a candidate’s first impressions of a company. It tells them what the role involves, what the employer values, and whether they can picture themselves succeeding there. When a posting includes an overwhelming list of requirements, vague responsibilities, or unrealistic expectations, even qualified candidates may decide it’s not worth even applying.

The goal isn’t to lower your standards. It’s to make sure your job description reflects what the role actually needs.

Here are a few questions hiring managers should ask themselves before posting their next opening:

1. Are you looking for one person to do the work of three?

It’s easy for job descriptions to grow over time. One responsibility gets added, then another, until a single position seems to require expertise in several unrelated areas. A role might ask for someone who can manage IT infrastructure, lead major implementations, oversee cybersecurity, analyze data, and provide day-to-day technical support. Some professionals may have experience across several of these areas, but that doesn’t necessarily mean all of them belong in one position.

Before publishing a job description, take a step back and identify the responsibilities that are essential to the role. If the position has expanded significantly, consider whether those expectations are realistic for one person.

Tip: Separate the core responsibilities from tasks that are occasional, secondary, or handled by another team. This helps candidates understand what they’ll actually be doing and helps employers set clearer expectations.

2. Are your requirements really requirements?

Years of experience, specific degrees, certifications, and familiarity with particular tools can all be useful ways to evaluate candidates. The problem arises when every preference becomes a must-have.

A candidate might have eight years of experience with a competing platform, but be overlooked because the posting requests ten years with a specific product. Another applicant might have the right technical skills and a strong track record but lack a certification that isn’t essential to the job.

That doesn’t mean employers should ignore genuine qualifications. Some roles require specific credentials, technical knowledge, or industry experience. However, it’s worth asking whether each requirement is necessary for someone to perform the job successfully.

Tip: Divide qualifications into two categories: 1 – What someone needs to succeed on day one and 2 – What they can reasonably learn after joining the team.

3. Have you explained what success actually looks like?

Job descriptions often focus heavily on qualifications without giving candidates a clear picture of the work itself. Phrases like “strong communication skills,” “self-starter,” and “ability to thrive in a fast-paced environment” are common, but they don’t tell applicants much about what their day-to-day responsibilities will involve.

Candidates want to understand what they’ll be responsible for, who they’ll work with, and what success looks like in the position. Instead of relying on broad descriptions, provide examples of the work the person will perform and the outcomes they’re expected to achieve. Rather than asking for someone with ERP experience, explain whether they’ll support an existing system, participate in a migration, troubleshoot issues, or help implement new functionality.

Tip: Review your job description from the perspective of someone considering the position. Could they explain what the job involves after reading it? If not, add more detail about the responsibilities and expectations.

4. Are you making candidates guess what the opportunity offers?

A job description doesn’t need to answer every question, but it should give candidates enough information to decide whether the opportunity is worth pursuing.

When practical details are missing, applicants may be left wondering about the work arrangement, compensation range, schedule, travel expectations, or whether the position is permanent or contract-based. These details can influence whether someone applies, particularly when candidates are weighing multiple opportunities.

Being upfront about the important details can help attract people whose expectations align with the role and reduce misunderstandings later in the process.

Tip: Include this information candidates will likely want to know, such as location, remote or hybrid expectations, employment type, schedule, and compensation range where appropriate and permitted by law.

5. Are you hiring for skills or a perfect match on paper?

The strongest candidate doesn’t always have the most closely matched resume. Someone who has worked in a similar environment, solved comparable problems, or learned new technologies quickly may bring valuable experience, even if their career path doesn’t match every line of the job description.

This is particularly relevant in technical fields, where tools and platforms change, and professionals often develop transferable skills across different systems. A candidate who has worked with one ERP platform may be able to adapt to another. Someone with experience in a different industry may bring a fresh perspective on a familiar operational challenge.

The key is understanding which skills transfer and which require specific, hands-on experience.

Tip: Identify the underlying abilities needed for the role, such as troubleshooting, systems integration, analytical thinking, or project coordination. Consider whether candidates can demonstrate those abilities through relevant experience, practical assessments, or examples of previous work.

A better job description starts with clearer expectations…

A good job description should do more than list qualifications. It should help the right candidates recognize an opportunity where their skills, experience, and goals align with the work.

Before publishing your next opening, ask yourself:

• Are the responsibilities realistic for one person?
• Which qualifications are essential, and which are preferences?
• Have we clearly explained what the person will do?
• Have we included the practical details candidates need?
• Are we open to qualified candidates with transferable skills?

Taking a little extra time to review a posting can help set clearer expectations on both sides. It can also give hiring teams a more focused starting point for evaluating applicants.

The goal isn’t to attract everyone. It’s to help the right people see why the role could be a good fit—and give them a clear reason to apply.

Looking for qualified IT candidates? Contact us.